Tsai Calls for Entry Ban on People Supporting Unification|宣揚武統.一國兩制 總統:禁入境台灣
發布時間：
更新時間：
President Tsai Ing-wen attended a National Security Council meeting and said she won't allow people who advocate "one country, two systems" and "unification by force" to enter Taiwan. Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chen Ming-tong stressed that Tsai's concern is for national security and social order and "normal" exchanges are generally still welcome.
The Tsai administration recently deported Chinese scholar Li Yi for advocating unification by force. A political party has asked him to address what happened via videoconference. During a National Security Council meeting on the 16th, President Tsai Ing-wen said no one advocating "one country, two systems" or "unification by force" should be allowed into Taiwan. The following day, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chen Ming-tong told lawmakers Tsai was merely concerned about national security and social order and "normal" exchanges are in general still welcome.
Can you explain whether that Chinese scholar that was deported came to Taiwan as a tourist or to hold meetings?
Advocating "one country, two systems" harms our domestic national security and social order. The point is, we can restrict these overseas people from entering Taiwan.
Chen also announced that entry permits for a pro-unification by force group scheduled to arrive in Taiwan at the end of the month have been revoked, saying assessment standards will meet a certain ratio. The legislative Internal Administration Committee will start reviewing cross-strait agreement oversight regulations this week. There are currently six versions awaiting review, including one from the Democratic Progressive Party caucus. Each has its own definition of "political agreement," which has resulted in "match-fixing" criticism.
(When the time comes, how do we determine which issues are political in nature and which aren't? We don't have any set criteria in place to make the designation.) Government agencies and legislative agencies should have enough intelligence to determine what constitutes a political issue. There are also many prominent, worthy people in society, and many experts as well. They can offer their opinions.
As lawmakers debated Tsai's call for the entry ban, Chen was also asked whether making statements over videoconference or publicly advocating Taiwan independence and eradicating the Republic of China likewise harms national security. In response, he said Tsai's policies target only overseas people and the public can still choose to reject "one country, two systems" statements made over videoconference.
中國學者李毅因為宣傳武統台灣，日前被政府限期出境，現在又有政黨團體將影像方式，邀他隔海「現聲說法」，引發關注。總統蔡英文週二在國安會議中，裁示拒絕來台宣揚「一國兩制」、「武統」的人士入境。陸委會主委陳明通17號上午到立院備詢，強調重點在影響國家安全及社會安定之虞者，一般正常交流仍舊歡迎。
無黨藉立委 趙正宇表示：「我們那個中國的學者遭驅逐出境，請你說明一下，他到底是來觀光還是來開會？」
陸委會主委 陳明通表示：「宣揚一國兩制台灣方案，這個引起我們的國內這個有國家安全，還有社會安定之虞，這個我們就是可以限制這些境外人士，重點在這裡。」
陳明通以月底將來台的武統宣導團，已經取消入境許可的例子，強調判定標準，會符合一定的比例原則。由於立院內政委員會本週開始審查兩岸協議監督條例，目前有民進黨團等6個版本待審，可是各版本對於何謂「政治協議」，都沒有明確定義，引來打假球的批評。
民進黨立委 張宏陸 vs. 陸委會主委 陳明通表示：「(到時候我們如何來界定政治性的議題是哪些？非政治性的議題是哪些？這個我們又沒有很明確的去界定。) 行政部門跟立法部門應該有足夠的智慧，去認定什麼是一個政治性的議題啦！另外社會上也有很多賢達人士，很多的專家他也可以去提供這個意見。」
17號朝野立委鎖定，拒絕來台宣揚「一國兩制」、「武統」者入境的政策，但若以視訊的方式來宣揚，或是宣揚台獨，是否也算危害國內安全，消滅中華民國？陳明通只回應，政策的重點是針對境外人士，也強調如果是視訊方式，民眾還是可以選擇拒絕接受一國兩制的說法。
