Academician Questions Domestic Vaccines 院士批國產疫苗前 已辭疫苗專家會議委
發布時間:
更新時間:
Academia Sinica academician Chen Pei-jer recently questioned the technology used to produce domestic COVID-19 vaccines. It was then revealed that he had recently resigned as a member of a government committee on domestic vaccine efficacy evaluation methods. Chen clarified that he made the statement after he resigned at the end of May, and the reason for his resignation was doubts over the independence of the committee.
Academia Sinica academician Chen Pei-jer recently issued a statement saying he had doubts over the technology used to make domestic COVID-19 vaccines. It was then revealed that he was a member of a Food and Drug Administration committee on domestic vaccine efficacy evaluation methods. Although he had already resigned, his statement may have violated professional ethics. Chen clarified that he issued the statement after resigning from the committee at the end of May. The reason for his resignation was President Tsai Ing-wen's statement that domestically produced vaccines would be administered starting at the end of July. He said the FDA would not be able to resist the pressure placed on it by the president, and it would also be difficult for members to maintain their independence. In response, Chong Inn-wen, the convener of the committee, said he is still trying to convince Chen to stay.
Academia Sinica academician Chen Pei-jer recently issued a statement saying he had doubts over the technology used to make domestic COVID-19 vaccines. It was then revealed that he was a member of a Food and Drug Administration committee on domestic vaccine efficacy evaluation methods. Although he had already resigned, his statement may have violated professional ethics. Chen clarified that he issued the statement after resigning from the committee at the end of May. The reason for his resignation was President Tsai Ing-wen's statement that domestically produced vaccines would be administered starting at the end of July. He said the FDA would not be able to resist the pressure placed on it by the president, and it would also be difficult for members to maintain their independence. In response, Chong Inn-wen, the convener of the committee, said he is still trying to convince Chen to stay.
He of course has his own considerations, and he will express his academic opinions. Dr. Chen expressed his intent to resign, but we are still trying to convince him to stay. Everyone is hoping he will remain as part of the committee.
Premier Su Tseng-chang commented on Chen's statement that the FDA would not be able to resist pressure from the president, saying everything is being conducted according to law and science, to ensure the safety of the people.
There must be a standard, no matter what. Mr. Premier, do you agree with this statement? Moreover, relevant data must be made public for everyone to analyze after unblinding. Okay.
Opposition legislators asked Health and Welfare Minister Chen Shih-chung to ensure that the unblinding process would be transparent and public.
Whether it's CMC (chemical, manufacturing, and control) procedures or any type of related requirement, you can take the initiative to announce standards, and then publicize related data. There's no problem with this. We might have to wait until after unblinding to announce related data.
The Presidential Office said it was unaware that Chen Pei-jer had been a member of the committee or that he had resigned. It added that it respects his opinion, even if it is a contrary one. However, it emphasized that no one knew who Chen was before the news of his resignation came to light. The Presidential Office therefore does not understand and regrets Chen's statements.
中研院院士陳培哲日前發表,對國產疫苗技術質疑的言論,遭外界爆料具有衛福部食藥署的國產疫苗療效評估方法專家會議委員身分,雖然已經請辭,但發言恐怕違反專業倫理。但陳培哲對此回應表示,已在五月底辭去專家會議委員職務後才發言,請辭是因為總統蔡英文之前說七月底開打國產疫苗,食藥署怎麼可能擋住總統的壓力,審查委員也會很難維持獨立性。對於陳培哲請辭,國產疫苗療效評估方法專家會議召集人鍾飲文表達慰留。
國產疫苗療效評估方法專家會議召集人 鍾飲文表示:「他當然有他的考量,他會表達他基於學術上的,有一些他的想法。陳院士是有表達他的辭意,不過我們還在慰留中,大家都是希望,他能留在委員會。」
對於陳培哲表示食藥署擋不住總統壓力,行政院長蘇貞昌則表示一切依法、以及用科學態度,保護國人健康。
行政院長 蘇貞昌 vs. 時代力量黨立委 邱顯智表示:「 (不管是怎麼樣,都要有一個標準出來,院長,這個你同意嘛?) 而且解盲後相關數據,都會公布供大家檢驗。( 好。)」
在野黨立委要求衛福部長陳時中,疫苗解盲過程要公開透明。
衛福部長 陳時中 vs. 時代力量黨立委 邱顯智表示:「不管是在程序CMC(化學製造管制)上面,或各類都有相關的一個要求。(那這個可以公布一個標準主動公告,然後去公布相關的數據,這沒有問題嘛?) 公布相關的數據,可能要等解盲之後。」
總統府也透過發言人張惇涵表示,總統府並不知道陳培哲擔任或辭去疫苗審查委員,即便陳培哲近期發表不同見解,也充分尊重他的發言。但也指出陳培哲請辭消息曝光後,外界才注意到陳培哲有這個身分。因此總統府對陳院士的說法感到不解與遺憾。
