Taipei Dome Returns to Headlines|大巨蛋七度都審闖關過 市府被批強渡關山
加入公視會員，
按讚收藏你關注的報導
發布時間：
更新時間：
The Taipei Dome controversy continues to simmer. On Oct. 14, Taipei City's urban review committee assessed constructor Farglory Group's plans for the seventh time. As the company agreed to make some modifications, it will no longer have to conduct any more simulations. Responding to speculations, Taipei City Mayor Ko Wen-je denied he was trying to sway voters.
The Taipei Dome controversy continues to simmer. On Oct. 14, Taipei City's urban review committee assessed constructor Farglory Group's plans for the seventh time. Farglory agreed to make some modifications with regards to emergency evacuation simulation scenarios, including turning part of the first floor space into a half outdoor space. This means it will no longer have to conduct any more simulations. In response, some said the Taipei City Government had forced the approval through, and accused Department of Urban Development Commissioner Hwang Jing-maw, who had presided over the meeting, of throwing the game. Former commissioner Lin Jou-min said it was another futile attempt, and Taipei City Mayor Ko Wen-je denied he was trying to sway voters.
No, let me tell you, if I wanted to force it through, it wouldn't have gone through seven reviews. Specialized issues of course require specialized answers. I think it's like this, because this type of software was not invented in Taiwan. Those professionals in the United Kingdom should be the ones answering whether this program has been set up reasonably or unreasonably.
Ko said there are two factors contributing to the problems of Taipei Dome, which are people and spaces. He therefore advocated not setting the capacity at 140,000 at the beginning. Some people believe that it will be hard to reduce the area and the number of people in the future without computer simulations, and Ko responded he is not clear about the details. One city councilor also questioned the intent behind the city government's determination to pass this case.
We believe that Mayor Ko Wen-je will resolve this issue (Taipei Dome) before he leaves office in order to ensure there won't be any black marks on his record as mayor.
The Taipei City Government is vying for the rights to host the 2030 Asian Games. Ko said he and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi have spoken about co-hosting the event.
If we want to organize the Asian Games, it shouldn't only be Taipei that applies. We should do so based on concept of the capital city living circle. That means it would include the Circular Line and TOD (transit oriented development).
Ko said hosting the Summer Universiade did not contribute anything to the city's long-term city plans. He also denied that Taipei Dome will become a bargaining chip as the city vies to host the Asian Games.
大巨蛋爭議多時，14號七度闖關台北市都市審議委員會，結果，遠雄在防災避難電腦模擬上，同意部分一樓改成半戶外空間方案，就不用再在任何模擬，引來外界質疑北市府強渡關山，主持會議的都發局長黃景茂更挨轟有放水嫌疑，前都發局長台林洲民痛批是「狗吠火車紀念日」，台北市長柯文哲受訪否認是選舉考量。
台北市長 柯文哲表示：「沒有，我跟你講，我要強渡關山的話，不會審七次，專業問題當然還是專業回答，但我覺得是這樣啦，因為這種軟體不是台灣自己發明的，還是英國那些專業人士來回答說，這種程式設定合理不合理。」
柯文哲表示，大巨蛋真正問題有兩個因素，分別是人跟空間，因此主張容留人數一開始不要設14萬人，不過，外界質疑沒有電腦模擬，未來要怎麼刪減面積以及控管人數，柯文哲坦言細節不清楚，市議員則質疑市府讓大巨蛋硬闖過關的意圖。
民進黨台北市議員 阮昭雄表示：「我們認為可能柯文哲市長，會在他卸任之前，把這事情(大巨蛋)給解決，以確保他在整個市長生涯當中，不會有太大的汙點。」
針對北市府有意爭辦2030亞洲運動會，柯文哲透露和新北市長侯友宜聊過，希望以雙北名義，共同生活圈的概念去作申請。
台北市長 柯文哲表示：「如果我們要去辦亞運，不要說只有台北去申請，應該要首都生活圈的概念，所以說包括環狀線，那在上面架TOD，以交通為導向的都市計畫。」
柯文哲以世大運為例，他表示當年風光舉辦，卻對台北市長遠都市計畫沒有任何幫助，而大巨蛋會不會是爭取亞運主辦權的籌碼?就怕再被大做文章，柯文哲再三否認。
