Review reveals lack of adherence to procedure / 誤射雄三飛彈 國防部承認未依SOP監督執行　　　　　　　　　　

National Defense Minister Feng Shih-kuan went to the Legislative Yuan and gave a report on the Hsiung Feng III missile misfire incident. The Ministry of National Defense listed military exercise log entries that didn't follow standard operation procedures, and promised to improve and make military reforms. When Feng was asked whether he will resign, he said that he will apologize to the public and the victim's family. He will also find out the true cause of the launch and reinforce military discipline. ==LU YU LING, KMT legislator with FENG SHIH KUAN, National Defense Minister== (Have you written your resignation?) I know nothing about it. National Defense Minister Feng Shih-kuan made a report on Hsiung Feng III missile misfire incident at the Legislative Yuan. Feng apologized and emphasized that he will take responsibility for military reform. However he didn't mention whether he will resign. ==FENG SHIH KUAN, National Defense Minister== I need to make an apology to the public. I also need to express my deepest condolences and apology to the victim's family. ==CHIANG CHI CHEN, KMT legislator with FENG SHIH KUAN National Defense Minister== (Is there a second round punishment?) According to the outcome of the judicial investigation, I am responsible for three things. First, tell the public the truth about the incident. Second, take good care of the victim's family. Third, take the blame for the military personnel's mistakes and improve. According to the Ministry of National Defense's review, there were several causes that led to the misfire. No officials were present and no safety procedures were followed prior to live fire. No one supervised Petty Officer Second Class Kao Chia-chun during the military exercise. The navy captain and personnel in charge of the weapons and the launch of the missile didn't follow standard operation procedures. The report also included the rundown of the misfire. However, it was questioned by legislators. ==LO CHIH CHENG, DPP legislator WITH PAN CHIN LUNG, MND inspector== (Was there a notification of Live Fire?) According to the initial investigation, there was not. (No standard operation procedures were followed, right ? ) Yes. (And you didn't mention about it until we asked.) Feng clarified that after the misfire, the national security systems were started up. He said that false operation, improper procedures and all other mistakes have been added to the list. TRANSLATED BY：ARIEL HSIEH ==國民黨立委 呂玉鈴 vs 國防部長 馮世寬== 你的辭呈寫好了沒有 我不知道什麼辭呈 海軍誤射雄三飛彈，國防部長馮世寬到國會專案報告，立委劈頭就要馮世寬下台，倒是馮世寬以道歉開場，對進退沒有正面回應，但強調一肩扛起軍中改革。 ==國防部長 馮世寬== 我仍然要對社會大眾 致以歉意 我也要向罹難的家屬 致最大的歉意與誠意 ==國民黨立委 江啟臣 vs 國防部長 馮世寬== 有沒有第二批的懲處 我們要依據司法調查的結果 我該負責的責任有三點 第一點 要查明真相向大眾公布 第二點 要把家屬的善後處理做好 第三點 對於軍中的缺失 我要一肩承擔把它改進 國防部檢討報告中，肇因分析包括接火線安全接頭沒有官員督導，中士高嘉駿執行演練也無幹部在場，艦長和兵器長及射控士官長沒有按SOP監督執行，報告還列出雄三誤射流程，從早上06:35做裝備自測，領取火線安全接頭，06:40及07:30安裝；08:03高嘉駿設好模擬座標；08:05模擬發射；08:12雄三飛彈誤射；08:16海軍向聯合作戰中心回報，08:18進駐台北作戰中心，08:28指示搜索等，立委則質疑在接上火線安全接頭並未"掛牌"示警，有違SOP，甚至誤射時間點，也有爭議。 ==民進黨立委 羅致政 vs 總督察長 潘進隆== 火線裝了有沒有掛牌 根據7月1日當天初步的調查 是沒有掛牌 所以這已經違反SOP嘛 對不對 是的 這麼重要的一個動作 你們之前都不講 ==民進黨立委 蔡適應 vs 海軍參謀長 梅家樹== 為什麼你們第一個階段 公布是8點15分 之後又改時間公布8點12分呢 攝影機的時間它是12分多 我們那時候為了 配合整個調查事件 我們把它調整 我們國軍的整個戰備時間 應該是很準的啦 是的 怎麼我們會以一個 軍艦上的監視器的時間 以它為基準呢 馮世寬也澄清，誤射事件發生後，國安機制有立刻啟動，但是這次誤射，從應由士官長領取火線，卻由一般士官領取，到高嘉駿第一次擔任操作手，卻沒有其他人員在場，以及誤觸作戰模式等等，馮世寬說都已列入檢討範圍。 記者 李曉儒 陳柏諭 台北報導