Environmental Groups Urge Plan for Worst-case Nuclear Scenarios 核四是否重啟? 環團:應納最壞劇本應變

Anti-nuclear groups expressed their worries as a misplaced chair triggered an emergency shutdown at the second nuclear power plant last month. They say the strange incident shows that human negligence is unpredictable and could lead to the "worst-case scenarios."


On July 27, the second nuclear power plant's No. 2 reactor experienced a shutdown, which was reportedly caused by a chair that accidentally knocked into the protective cover of a main steam isolation valve switch. The National Nuclear Abolition Action Platform said this incident shows how unpredictable human negligence could be. It criticized Taiwan Power Company for betting everyone's life on their so-called "nuclear safety."

Tsai Chung-yueh, Deputy Executive Director, Citizen of the Earth:” The most ridiculous thing is that we only have their version. The security cameras that were there weren't recording. This is how Taiwan's nuclear safety is managed. This is what they've been doing for the past 30 years. We're putting lives on the line.”

Meanwhile, anti-nuclear group Mom Loves Taiwan voiced their concerns about Taiwan's preparedness for a nuclear disaster as the island still lacks "worst-case nuclear disaster scenarios". They said 300,000 people would have to evacuate should Taiwan apply a 20-kilometer evacuating radius used in Fukushima. The number will increase to nearly 8.5 million if U.S. standard of 80-kilometer radius is applied, which is impractical for the island.

Yang Shun-mei, Secretary-General, Mom Loves Taiwan: “Where are we supposed to flee? Into the ocean? Jumping into the ocean is also dangerous. The whole island can't escape outside of the 20-kilometer radius.” 

The Atomic Energy Council said it has always been prepared for the worst-case scenario.

Li Chi-ssu, Director, Dept. of Nuclear Technology, AEC:” We come up with hypothetical situations, such as the power plant suffering a compound disaster, causing a core meltdown. We test and train personnel to respond to these contingencies and what to do outside of the plant. "

Groups said they've never seen personnel and vehicles conducting on-site drills for large-scale evacuations resulting from a nuclear disaster. The AEC said it reviewed its measures after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster and the current strategy is for the evacuation to be carried out in a preventative, staggered, and region-separate manner to avert large numbers of people and vehicles and ensure traffic flows smoothly. It also said this year is the 10th anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, and it has already completed inventorying and preparing national nuclear disaster response capabilities, such as shelters, military and police assistance, and radiation detection equipment. It said it has made all the preparations it can.

 

 

上個月二十七號,核二廠2號機,發生座椅不小心撞到隔離閥開關,導致反應爐急停,全國廢核行動平台認為,這顯示出人為疏失無可預料,這次是反應爐 急停,但也有可能下一次引發核災,更批評台電長年自詡核安第一,但一切都是他們自己說了算,陷人民於賭注之中。

地球公民基金會副執行長 蔡中岳:「最誇張的什麼,最誇張的是一切東西都是他們說的,因為監視器放在那個地方沒有錄影。這就是台灣的核能安全,三十幾年是這樣在做得,我們就是拿命在賭。」

而媽媽監督核電廠聯盟指出,台灣目前尚未有核災發生的「最壞劇本」,質疑若發生核災,恐難有應變能力,假設以日本福島核災,強制撤離二十公里範圍的民眾來看,在台灣有近三十萬人要離開家園,若是用美國撤僑八十公里的範圍來看,在台灣有847萬人受影響,問題是在台灣根本無處可逃。

媽媽監督核電廠聯盟秘書長 楊順美:「往哪裡逃啊?都跳海嗎?跳海也是危險的,為什麼?因為在二十公里外,整個島都逃不掉。」

原能會回應,一直都有最壞的劇本。

聲音來源 原能會核技處長 李綺思:「我們都會假想,電廠遭受複合式災害,然後導致爐心熔毀,然後來測驗,訓練應變的人員怎麼去搶救以及廠外怎麼去因應。」

針對環團質疑,在核災撤離疏散,未見過大量人車出現的實地演練,質疑成效。原能會表示,從福島的經驗來檢討瞭後,目前是以預防性、分時分區方式疏散,避免大量的人車,讓交通動彈不得。原能會強調,今年福島核災發生十週年,已完成全國核災能量的盤點整備,像收容站能量、軍警應變人力,與輻射偵檢設備等等,盡可能做好所有可能的準備。
 

相關新聞

專題|全台敬老金大調查