Civic Groups Call for Health Surcharge on US Meat|健保會代表提案 籲對美豬牛徵"食安健康捐"

M. Chuang
發布時間: 更新時間:

As the controversy continues, a proposal has been made to implement a food safety and health surcharge on imported American pork and beef. The National Health Insurance Committee will meet on Sept. 25 to discuss it.

American pork and 30-plus month beef containing leanness-enhancing agent Ractopamine will flood Taiwan's market starting next year. There has been a public outcry against the government's decision to lift the import ban on meat containing the substance, and many say the long-term impact of Ractopamine ingestion will create an even heavier burden on the flailing national health insurance system. Civic representatives are calling for a "food safety and health" surcharge on imported American meat that can be used to shore up the health insurance system. The National Health Insurance Committee will meet on the 25th to discuss the proposal.

If this food safety issue turns into health issues, ultimately this will lead to a sick population that will require even more medical care. This obviously means higher medical expenditures.

Consumer group representative and committee member Wu Jung-ta opposes this. Wu says a food safety and health surcharge differs from the tobacco health surcharge because people have the right to decide whether to smoke but the decision to lift the import ban was made unilaterally by the government. Wu also says taxing importers will inevitably result in higher prices and consumers will be the one to foot the bill.

Citizens have a passive role in this. They will be harmed without their knowledge. They are not being given the right to choose (what to eat). Therefore, a food safety and health surcharge would be extremely unfair to citizens.

The national health insurance system has been in the red for three years now, with total losses of NT$26.6 billion in 2019 and the reserve fund only able to sustain operations for less than six weeks. A premium hike at the end of the year therefore seems inevitable. The National Health Insurance Administration says it will respect the committee's decision and further discussions will be held after the meeting on the 25th.


台灣社區醫院協會理事長 朱益宏表示:「如果是食安的問題,造成健康的疑慮,那最終會造成,因為吃了這些食物以後,老百姓比較容易生病。生病的結果,當然是到醫療機構去就醫嘛,那當然相對的,他就會增加醫療費用的支出。」


消基會祕書長 吳榮達表示:「老百姓來講,他是一個被動、不知的情況之下受害的,他沒有一個選擇權的。所以這樣的課徵食品安全,這個食品安全捐的部分來講,我覺得這樣子的課徵,是對我們民眾來講,是不公平的。」